(S044) Repeated Measures Analyses of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v3.0)-Based Dermatitis Toxicities in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Radiotherapy in a Phase III Randomized Trial of Mometasone Furoate, N06c4 (Alliance)

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 28
Issue 4_Suppl_1

Using repeated measures analyses, we analyzed the data from the originally published N06C4 prospective trial and present here the CTCAE-based temporal profile of acute skin toxicities, when time factor was considered.

Terence T. Sio, MD, MS, Pamela J. Atherton, MS, David J. Schwartz, MD, Jeff A. Sloan, PhD, Drew K. Seisler, BS, James A. Martenson, MD, Patricia C. Griffin, MD, Roscoe F. Morton, MD, Jon C. Anders, MD, Thomas J. Stoffel, MD, Robert E. Haselow, MD, Rex B. Mowat, MD, Michelle A. Neben Wittich, MD, James D. Bearden III, MD, Charles L. Loprinzi, MD, Robert C. Miller, MD, MS; Mayo Clinic; Upstate Carolina CCOP; Iowa Oncology; Wichita CCOP; Cedar Rapids CCOP; Metro-Minnesota CCOP; Toledo Community Hospital CCOP

Purpose: The evolution of dermatological symptoms over time as measured by provider-assessed Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 (CTCAE v3.0) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is not well quantified. Using repeated measures analyses, we analyzed the data from the originally published N06C4 prospective trial and present here the CTCAE-based temporal profile of acute skin toxicities, when time factor was considered. The PRO results were previously reported (Abstract, ASTRO 2013, TT Sio and RC Miller et al).

Patients and Methods: A total of 176 breast cancer patients (including ductal carcinoma in situ) undergoing external beam radiotherapy (RT) to the breast or chest wall were randomized to receive daily mometasone or placebo cream. Temporal symptoms were assessed for up to 10 cycles; the provider-reported CTCAEs, including radiation (XRT)-induced dermatitis, pruritus, skin burn, skin disorder, skin striae, skin hypopigmentation, skin atrophy, and skin infection, were collected. The analyzed groups included XRT-induced dermatitis, dermatitis-related symptoms (seven items, excluding XRT-induced dermatitis), and worst dermatitis-related symptoms (eight items included). We applied repeated measures analyses of variance with mixed models (Proc Mixed), Pearson’s correlation, and risk analyses methodologies. Adverse event (AE) grades were modeled using arm and cycle as classification variables with interaction effects. A maximum grade of any dermatitis-related symptom was calculated per patient per evaluation cycle.

Results: One hundred sixty-nine (96%) patients were evaluable for toxicity. CTCAE symptoms typically started during Cycles 3 and 4, peaked between Cycles 4 and 7, and subsided after Cycles 8 and 9. Of the evaluable patients at each cycle, the grade 2+ (2 or higher) AE rates were: 26 (16%) of 167 patients in Cycle 4; 47 (28%) of 165 patients in Cycle 5; 58 (38%) of 151 patients in Cycle 6; 39 (36%) of 109 patients in Cycle 7; 4 (22%) of 18 patients in Cycle 8; and 1 (50%) of 2 patients in Cycle 9. For dermatitis-related symptoms, 110 (20%) of 537 events were grade 2 or higher in the mometasone arm versus 124 (18%) of 688 events in the placebo arm; 7 (1%) and 16 (3%) grade 3 toxicities were reported in the mometasone and placebo arms, respectively. Similar trends were observed for radiation-induced dermatitis, with event frequencies about half of that for dermatitis-related symptoms. Repeated measures analysis results showed that significant differences were detected across cycles in five out of nine symptoms and in the interaction between arms across cycles in two out of nine symptoms, including radiation-induced dermatitis and the maximum grade of dermatitis-related symptoms (P < .001, favoring mometasone). The CTCAE scales correlated weakly with the PRO tools by Pearson’s statistics. Risk analyses confirmed these results.

Conclusions: The CTCAE tools captured a detailed range of patient experience and symptoms, when the time variable was taken into consideration. Our results strengthened the conclusion drawn from the original report that mometasone reduced acute skin toxicities. The use of frequent CTCAE-based assessments, along with PRO surveys, to accurately assess a patient’s experience of symptom types and intensity over time should be encouraged in the design of future clinical trials.

Proceedings of the 96th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(S002) Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma Metastases
(S001) Limb-Sparing Surgery and Intraoperative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Primary, Nonmetastatic Extremity and Limb-Girdle Soft Tissue Sarcoma
(S003) Disparities in Stage at Diagnosis and Survival in Adult Cancer Patients According to Insurance Status
(S004) Radiation Publications Underrepresented in High-Impact General Medical and Oncology Journals 
(S005) Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Stage II Endometrial Carcinoma: Is Brachytherapy Alone Sufficient for Local Control?
(S006) Extended-Field IMRT With Concomitant Boost for Node-Positive Cervical Cancer: Analysis of Regional Control Rate and Recurrence Pattern
(S007) Stereotactic Radiosurgery to the Brain With Concurrent BRAF Inhibitors for Melanoma Metastases
(S008) Use of Mobile Devices for Creation of Survivorship Care Plans
(S009) Two-Year Outcomes Following Triapine Radiochemotherapy for Cervical Cancer 
(S010) Prospective and Real-Time Data Analysis of Image-Guided Radiotherapy Across a Multinational Pediatrics Consortium: Methodology and Considerations 
(S011) Comparison of Toxicities and Outcomes for Conventional and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Early Glottic Carcinoma
(S013) Adjuvant Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide for Anaplastic Gliomas: The Twelve-Year Washington University Experience
(S014) Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Brainstem Metastases
(S015) Temporal Lobe Radionecrosis After Skull Base Radiotherapy: Dose-Volume Predictors 
(S012) Prognostic Value of Radiographic Extracapsular Extension in Locally Advanced Non-Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancers
Recent Videos
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Future meetings may address how immunotherapy, bispecific agents, and CAR T-cell therapies can further impact the AML treatment paradigm.
Treatment with revumenib appeared to demonstrate efficacy among patients with KMT2A-rearranged acute leukemia in the phase 2 AUGMENT-101 study.
Advocacy groups such as Cancer Support Community and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society may help support patients with CML undergoing treatment.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, discusses the potential utility of agents such as datopotamab deruxtecan and enfortumab vedotin in patients with breast cancer.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, highlights strategies related to screening and multidisciplinary collaboration for managing ILD in patients who receive T-DXd.
Data from the REVEAL study affirm elevated white blood cell counts and higher variant allele frequency as risk factors for progression in polycythemia vera.
Related Content