(S047) Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: Changes in Presenting Stage in Minority Populations in Florida From 1981–2009

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 28
Issue 4_Suppl_1

We examined whether presenting stage at time of breast cancer diagnosis has changed over time in Florida and whether there is variation in this change with respect to race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.

S047: Figure

Austin Dosch, BS, Margaret M. Byrne, PhD, Tulay Koru-Sengal, MS, Feng Miao, MS, Jean L. Wright, MD; University of Miami Miller School of Medicine

Background: Screening has led to a decrease in the number of women diagnosed with late-stage breast cancer, but there are limited studies assessing stage at diagnosis over time for black and Hispanic patients, who historically have been more likely to present with advanced disease. We examined whether presenting stage at time of breast cancer diagnosis has changed over time in Florida and whether there is variation in this change with respect to race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES).

Methods: Data were obtained from the Florida Cancer Data System (FCDS), which was linked with Florida’s Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) and with information from the US census track. Our sample included female breast cancer patients in Florida during 1981–2009 (n = 364,303). We excluded non-Florida residents aged < 18 years and with carcinoma in situ (n = 63,974). Patients with missing values for race, ethnicity, SES, or surgery (n = 73,678) were excluded, resulting in a total sample size of 226,651. Associations between categorical variables were examined using chi-square tests. Predictors of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) stage at diagnosis (local, regional, distant) were modeled with multinomial ordinal logistic regression models to obtain adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for race, ethnicity, and SES. The model includes the year of diagnosis to take into account the trend over time for stage at diagnosis. Type I error rate was set at 5%. SAS v9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) was used to perform all analyses.

Results: In total, 145,494 (64%) patients presented with local disease, 68,167 (30%) had regional disease, and 12,990 (6%) presented with distant disease. There were 206,994 (91%) white patients, 17,787 black patients (8%), and 1,920 (1%) of other races. A total of 207,311 (91%) were identified as non-Hispanic Latino, and 19,340 (9%) were Hispanic Latino. In the entire cohort, there was a significant increase in local disease and a decrease in regional and distant disease at presentation over the time period examined (P < .0001). The increase in local stage at diagnosis was greater for black than for white patients, as was the decrease in regional and distant disease (P < .001). Hispanic women also had a significant increase in localized disease and a decrease in regional and distant disease (P < .001), but there was little difference in the rate of change compared with non-Hispanic women. Multivariable analysis showed that race, ethnicity, and SES were all significantly associated with change in stage of diagnosis over time. Despite a greater rate of change for black patients, whites continued to have greater odds of local presentation (OR = 1.78; 95% CI, 1.69–1.88), and Hispanic patients continued to have lower odds of local presentation compared with non-Hispanic patients (OR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.76–0.84).

Conclusions: Trends in Florida from 1981 to 2009 show that early-stage breast cancer diagnosis is more common over time in all race and ethnic groups. While there remains a significant disparity, with black and Hispanic patients being less likely to present with early-stage disease, the rate of change appears to be greater for black patients. Thus, this disparity may be decreasing over time, particularly for black patients.

Proceedings of the 96th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(S002) Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma Metastases
(S001) Limb-Sparing Surgery and Intraoperative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Primary, Nonmetastatic Extremity and Limb-Girdle Soft Tissue Sarcoma
(S003) Disparities in Stage at Diagnosis and Survival in Adult Cancer Patients According to Insurance Status
(S004) Radiation Publications Underrepresented in High-Impact General Medical and Oncology Journals 
(S005) Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Stage II Endometrial Carcinoma: Is Brachytherapy Alone Sufficient for Local Control?
(S006) Extended-Field IMRT With Concomitant Boost for Node-Positive Cervical Cancer: Analysis of Regional Control Rate and Recurrence Pattern
(S007) Stereotactic Radiosurgery to the Brain With Concurrent BRAF Inhibitors for Melanoma Metastases
(S008) Use of Mobile Devices for Creation of Survivorship Care Plans
(S009) Two-Year Outcomes Following Triapine Radiochemotherapy for Cervical Cancer 
(S010) Prospective and Real-Time Data Analysis of Image-Guided Radiotherapy Across a Multinational Pediatrics Consortium: Methodology and Considerations 
(S011) Comparison of Toxicities and Outcomes for Conventional and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Early Glottic Carcinoma
(S013) Adjuvant Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide for Anaplastic Gliomas: The Twelve-Year Washington University Experience
(S014) Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Brainstem Metastases
(S015) Temporal Lobe Radionecrosis After Skull Base Radiotherapy: Dose-Volume Predictors 
(S012) Prognostic Value of Radiographic Extracapsular Extension in Locally Advanced Non-Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancers
Related Videos
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
Data highlight that patients who are in Black and poor majority areas are less likely to receive liver ablation or colorectal liver metastasis in surgical cancer care.
Findings highlight how systemic issues may impact disparities in outcomes following surgery for patients with cancer, according to Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery may allow practices to de-escalate subsequent radiotherapy, says Barbara Smith, MD, PhD.
Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD, discussed ways to improve treatment and surgical outcomes for patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.
Barbara Smith, MD, PhD, spoke about the potential use of pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery based on reports from the phase 3 INSITE trial.
Patient-reported symptoms following surgery appear to improve with the use of perioperative telemonitoring, says Kelly M. Mahuron, MD.
Treatment options in the refractory setting must improve for patients with resected colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis, says Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Although immature, overall survival data from the KEYNOTE-868 trial may support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Related Content