Genitourinary Cancers

The US Preventive Services Task Force has concluded that notenough scientific evidence exists to promote routine screening ofall men over age 40 for prostate cancer via standard prostatespecificantigen test and/or digital rectal exam. The task force-sponsoredby the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality-concludedthat the tests are effective for diagnosis but that there is insufficientevidence to show that they affect long-term health or survival. The taskforce noted that results of the ongoing Prostate, Colorectal, Lung, andOvarian Screening Trial, designed to answer this question, will notbecome available until later in this decade.

ROCKVILLE, Maryland-The US Preventive Services Task Force has concluded that not enough scientific evidence exists to promote routine screening of all men over age 40 for prostate cancer via standard PSA test and/or digital rectal exam. The task force-sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality-concluded that the tests are effective for diagnosis but that there is insufficient evidence to show that they affect long-term health or survival. The task force noted that results of the ongoing Prostate, Colorectal, Lung, and Ovarian Screening Trial, designed to answer this question, will not become available until later in this decade.

NEW YORK-In patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer, a pulsed regimen of docetaxel (Taxotere) plus high-dose calcitriol is well tolerated and results in disease response by a variety of standard measures, according to results of a phase II trial.

As Dr. Raghavan has emphasizedin his excellent overviewof the current therapyfor testis cancer, it is critical that thesuccess of therapy for this diseasenot be compromised by a desire toavoid the complications of therapy.We would wholeheartedly agree withhis assertion that modifications intherapy must be introduced with athoughtful and structured approachto minimize the risk to efficacy.

Dr. Derek Raghavan, a recognizedexpert in the managementof testicular cancer, isto be congratulated for a clear andconcise overview of the contemporarymanagement of testicular cancer.As a urologist with almost 20years’ experience in the treatment oftesticular cancer, I fully agree withthe concept of not modifying or delayingthe use of proven treatmentprotocols.I can remember as an internand junior resident seeing youngcontemporaries die a horrible deathfrom testicular cancer. Any clinician40 years of age or older can relate tothis scenario, and it probably had thesame impact on them as it did onme-we don’t ever want to “gothere” again.

A6-year prostate cancer research plan released by the NationalInstitutes of Health (NIH) contains a detailed outline of theNational Cancer Institute’s (NCI) future strategy for dealingwith the disease, which includes a shift in the standard treatment modelfrom seek-and-destroy to target-and-control.

The management of germ cell tumors has advanced dramatically,with cure rates approaching 90% to 95%. Treatment of stage I/Aseminomas generally includes orchiectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy.Treatment of stage I/A nonseminomatous germ cell tumors involvesorchiectomy followed by retroperitoneal lymph node dissection oractive surveillance. One of the major advances has been the introductionof cisplatin-based chemotherapy for metastatic disease and thedevelopment of a system of risk attribution. The logical managementof any patient with curable disease is to provide curative therapy andthen follow the patient in a structured manner, to diagnose and treatany complications in a timely manner.

Dr. Raghavan is to be commendedfor a concise andcomprehensive overview ofthe management of germ cell tumors.As he suggests, given the demographicsof this relatively uncommon diseaseand the high cure rate that canbe achieved with proper treatmentand follow-up, it behooves us to maintainthese excellent results, even whilestriving to reduce the toxicity of treatment.We will highlight a few additionalpoints to complement thissuperb review.

BETHESDA, Maryland-A 6-year prostate cancer research plan released by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) contains a detailed outline of the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) future strategy for dealing with the disease, which includes a shift in the standard treatment model from seek-and-destroy to target-and-control.

FRAMINGHAM, Massachusetts-Genzyme Molecular Oncology has launched a phase I/II vaccine trial in advanced kidney cancer. The vaccine is made by combining the patient’s own cancer cells with dendritic cells using an electrical fusion approach. Up to 20 patients will be enrolled at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.

NEW ORLEANS-In the treatment of localized prostate cancer, biochemical failure rates are similar among permanent radioactive seed implantation, high-dose external beam radiation therapy, combination seeds/external radiation, and radical prostatectomy, according to a very large series of patients followed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

The addition of high-dose calcitriol (the active form of vitamin D) to weekly treatment with docetaxel (Taxotere) appears to improve response in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer without compromising safety, according to the results of a

ORLANDO-Adoptive transfer of T cells taken from tumor-draining lymph nodes and secondarily activated and expanded in vitro can shrink established renal cell cancers, according to phase II data reported at the 38th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (abstract 10). Alfred E. Chang, MD, chief of the Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, presented the study.

William Pirl and Jeffrey Mello present an informative overview of the psychological impact of prostate cancer. They also provide a practical framework for distress management, as promulgated by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN).

The authors challenge the notion that men with prostate cancer exhibit little psychological difficulty. In fact, we do not know much about actual distress rates in men with prostate cancer because few studies have directly measured distress in this population. Likewise, we do not know if the distress experienced by prostate cancer patients is qualitatively different from that of other cancer patients. By assuming that all men with prostate cancer "do well," we, as clinicians and researchers, may fail to ask patients important questions.

Over the past decade, interest has been growing in the quality of life of men with prostate cancer. Traditionally considered a group with few psychological complications, 10% to 20% of men with prostate cancer are found to have clinically significant levels of psychological distress. This article reviews the prevalence of psychiatric symptomatology among prostate cancer patients, the psychological challenges of coping with the disease, and general guidelines for treatment. [ONCOLOGY 16:1448-1467, 2002]

Pirl and Mello carefully review the current state of knowledge about the psychological complications of prostate cancer. Their discussion is worth reading, particularly by those who treat patients with the disease. To put this knowledge in context for the general reader, we should give some thought to what this review illustrates about all patients with a serious life-threatening illness.

African-American patients with advanced prostate cancer survived slightly longer than white patients, according to a multi-institutional study led by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute researchers. The findings, which were reported at the 38th annual

UPPSALA, Sweden-In a new study, radical prostatectomy reduced deaths due to prostate cancer but did not increase overall survival in men with newly diagnosed, early-stage disease. The Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer Study Group found that after a median 6.2 years of follow-up, there were no significant differences in overall survival, but patients randomized to radical prostatectomy were less likely to develop distant metastases than those randomized to watchful waiting.

ORLANDO-A new two-stage prostate cancer vaccine should be explored in a phase III study in metastatic prostate cancer patients, based on promising phase II results of an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial (E7897). Howard L. Kaufman, MD, reported the results of the "prime/boost" vaccine trial at the 38th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO abstract 12).

SEATTLE-Dendreon Corporation has announced preliminary results from its analysis of its randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study of Provenge (APC 8015) for the treatment of hormone-resistant prostate cancer. The trial of the cancer vaccine (D9901) involved 127 men with late-stage, metastatic, hormone-resistant prostate cancer, 82 of whom received Provenge, three vaccinations over a 4-week period.

The Bayer Corporation recently announced that it has teamed up with Us Too! International to offer Continuous Care, a program for advanced prostate cancer patients using the leuprolide acetate implant (Viadur). The program provides appointment reminders, education, support materials, and valuable health coupons.

ORLANDO-In clinical trials, black men with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer have the same and possibly longer survival, compared with whites, according to a pooled analysis of nearly 1,000 patients in four separate randomized phase III Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trials.

The bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (Zometa) is effective in the treatment of skeletal-related events from bone metastases in prostate cancer patients, according to data presented at the 97th annual meeting of the American Urological Association. Patients with advanced prostate cancer are at high risk for bone complications, including bone pain, pathologic fractures, need for radiation or surgery to bone, and spinal cord compression. This study marks the first time a bisphosphonate has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of bone metastases in this patient population.

BETHESDA, Maryland-The National Cancer Institute’s Kidney/Bladder Cancer Progress Review Group has released 13 priority recommendations intended to serve as a national plan to guide research in the two diseases over the next 5 years. The recommendations cover basic and translational research, cancer control, and cancer treatment, and range from understanding the biologic mechanisms underlying the two diseases to developing innovative strategies to eradicate them.

With no clearly superior treatment for localized prostate cancer, physicians and patients would like to increase patient participation in the decision-making process. Unfortunately, physicians frequently have difficulty understanding patients’ preferences, and patients often do not have sufficient knowledge to make an informed treatment decision. Shared- decision-making tools, such as decision analyses, may increase patient participation and thereby improve physicians’ understanding of their patients’ views.

Normal and hyperplastic prostate glandular epithelium does not express somatostatin receptors. Neuroendocrine prostatic cells contain bioactive secretory products such as chromogranin A, serotonin, and neuron-specific enolase. The stromal smooth muscle cells around glandular epithelium and ganglion cells of the prostatic plexus are positive for somatostatin subtype 2 receptors (sst 2).[1] In prostate cancer, however, there is nonhomogeneous distribution of sst 1. In the peritumoral veins of prostate cancer, sst 2 receptors were found by Reubi et al in 14 of 27 samples.[2]

This second installment on prostate specific antigen (PSA) as a marker of disease activity and cancer cell viability in prostate cancer focuses on its role in monitoring the effects of a variety of therapies at different stages of the disease. In addition, the authors propose guidelines for studying the efficacy of new treatments in this setting.

As a tumor marker, prostate specific antigen (PSA) has revolutionized the detection and management of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. From its discovery in the early 1970s to its application in the 1980s and finally widespread use in the 1990s, PSA has profoundly affected the way in which we treat prostate cancer. Many researchers in basic science and clinical practice have helped to create the PSA story, and the authors of this manuscript have made major contributions to our understanding of PSA as a tumor marker.

Despite the impact of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing on the detection and management of prostate cancer, controversy about its usefulness as a marker of disease activity continues. This review, based on a