Genitourinary Cancers

An analysis of the ARAMIS trial looked at quality of life and other outcomes with darolutamide in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

The PAIREDCAP trial looked at different biopsy approaches to see which has the highest cancer detection rate for prostate cancer.

A subanalysis of the PROCEED trial showed a surprisingly high survival advantage for a particular race of men receiving immunotherapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

An interim analysis of the CheckMate 920 phase IIIb/IV trial evaluated nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced renal cell carcinoma patients with brain metastases.

The KEYNOTE-426 study evaluated pembrolizumab plus axitinib vs sunitinib in patients with metastatic RCC with intermediate/poor risk disease and those with sarcomatoid features.

In this randomized phase III trial, researchers compared cytoreductive nephrectomy vs sunitinib alone in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

The phase II IMmotion150 study evaluated disease- and treatment-related symptoms in RCC patients receiving atezolizumab alone or in combination with bevacizumab vs sunitinib.

Findings from a planned subanalysis of IMmotion151 looked at combination atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with RCC and sarcomatoid histology.

The TAXOMET trial tested the addition of metformin to docetaxel and prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Researchers tested the administration of bone-targeted agents once every 12 weeks vs once every 4 weeks for a year in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

The study of sequential treatment of pazopanib followed by nivolumab in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma looked at benefit-risk profile and survival.

Researchers tested treatment with bone-protecting agents in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with enzalutamide or radium-223.

A pilot study evaluated cytoreductive surgery combined with immune checkpoint therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

The study investigators evaluated the survival benefit of pazopanib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with no evidence of disease after metastasectomy.

Progression-free survival was compared for the VEGF TKI tivozanib vs sorafenib across multiple subgroups of refractory advanced renal cell carcinoma.

A new agent that targets Nectin-4, a protein found in 97% of urothelial cancers, may be an option for patients with locally advanced or metastatic forms of urothelial cancer.

The phase III ENZAMET study showed 'practice-changing' results with enzalutamide for men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

The TOPARP-B study showed that olaparib had activity in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with DNA damage repair gene defects.

The researchers compared hormonotherapy plus radiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone in prostate cancer patients who previously underwent radical prostatectomy.

Researchers tested the androgen receptor inhibitor apalutamide plus ADT in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer.

This study compared combination therapy with enzalutamide, abiraterone, and prednisone vs enzalutamide alone in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

This study tested first-line treatment with cabazitaxel vs hormonal therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with poor prognosis.

The bar for the standard of care among patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma is set high as various promising combination therapies recently received FDA approval.

This review summarizes the current evidence supporting the use of SBRT as treatment for inoperable renal cell carcinoma, as well as provides recommendations for patient selection and reviews the technical aspects of treatment and the expected toxicities.

This case looks at an otherwise healthy 59-year-old man who was recently diagnosed with clinical stage IVB prostate adenocarcinoma. What is the most appropriate management for this patient?