scout
Opinion|Videos|April 15, 2026

Debate Round 3: CAR-T vs Bispecifics in Relapsed LBCL – “Cure” vs Access

The teams debate whether CAR-T or bispecific antibodies should be prioritized as the treatment paradigm evolves in relapsed large B-cell lymphoma, with Team NYC centering the argument on “cure” and the curative-intent potential/plateau of CAR-T outcomes. Team Roswell agrees cure is the goal but argues that real-world access barriers and “off-the-shelf” availability make bispecifics, and especially emerging combination strategies, crucial for patients who cannot reliably reach or complete CAR-T. The discussion highlights a key tradeoff: CAR T as a one-time, time-limited intervention vs bispecifics requiring ongoing dosing and infrastructure, with durability, infection risk, and sequencing still actively evolving.

The teams debate whether CAR-T or bispecific antibodies should be prioritized as the treatment paradigm evolves in relapsed large B-cell lymphoma, with Team NYC centering the argument on “cure” and the curative-intent potential/plateau of CAR-T outcomes. Team Roswell agrees cure is the goal but argues that real-world access barriers and “off-the-shelf” availability make bispecifics, and especially emerging combination strategies, crucial for patients who cannot reliably reach or complete CAR-T. The discussion highlights a key tradeoff: CAR T as a one-time, time-limited intervention vs bispecifics requiring ongoing dosing and infrastructure, with durability, infection risk, and sequencing still actively evolving.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.


Latest CME