(P026) Limiting Radiotherapy to the Contralateral Retropharyngeal and High Level II Lymph Nodes in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Is Safe and Improves Quality of Life

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 1S
Volume 28
Issue 1S

For patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), eliminating coverage to the contralateral high level II (HLII) lymph nodes and contralateral retropharyngeal lymph nodes (RPLNs) in the clinically uninvolved side of the neck is associated with minimal risk of failure in these regions and significantly improves patient-reported quality of life (QOL).

Christopher R. Spencer, MD, MS, Hiram A. Gay, MD, Brian Nussenbaum, MD, Douglas Adkins, MD, Tonya M. Wildes, MD, Todd A. DeWees, PhD, James S. Lewis, Jr, MD, Bruce H. Haughey, MBChB, MS, FACS, Wade L. Thorstad, MD; Washington University

Purpose: To report the results of using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to limit treatment of the contralateral retropharyngeal lymph nodes (RPLNs) in the clinically uninvolved neck for patients diagnosed with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in terms of safety and quality of life (QOL).

Materials and Methods: A prospective institutional database was used to identify patients treated using IMRT with primary oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, and unknown primary HNSCC between 1997 and 2010. There were three temporal treatment groups, or generations (G1–3). G1 received comprehensive neck IMRT with parotid sparing, G2 eliminated the contralateral high level II (HLII) lymph nodes, and G3 further eliminated the contralateral RPLNs in the clinically uninvolved neck. Patterns of failure and survival analyses were completed. The validated 20-question MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) was used to collect patient-reported QOL data. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to test for significance between treatment groups.

Results: There were 748 patients identified overall: 260 in G1, 205 in G2, and 283 in G3. Of the 488 patients treated in G2 or G3, 406 had a clinically uninvolved contralateral neck and were the focus of the safety data. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 37 months. There were no failures in the spared RPLNs (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%–1.3%) or high contralateral neck (95% CI, 0%–0.7%) regions. QOL data were compared between 44 patients in G1 and 51 patients in G3. There was a significant QOL improvement globally and in all domains assessed for G3, in which reduced radiotherapy volumes were used (P < .007).

Conclusions: For patients with locally advanced HNSCC, eliminating coverage to the contralateral HLII lymph nodes and contralateral RPLNs in the clinically uninvolved side of the neck is associated with minimal risk of failure in these regions and significantly improves patient-reported QOL.

Articles in this issue

(P113) Age and Marital Status Are Associated With Choice of Mastectomy in Patients Eligible for Breast Conservation Therapy
(P112) Single-Institution Experience With Intrabeam IORT for Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer
(P110) Breast Cancer Before Age 40: Current Patterns in Clinical Presentation and Local Management
(P111) Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation With Multicatheter High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Feasibility and Results in a Private Practice Cohort
(P115) Breast Cancer Laterality Does Not Influence Overall Survival in a Large Modern Cohort: Implications for Radiation-Related Cardiac Mortality
(P117) Anatomical Variations and Radiation Technique for Breast Cancer
(P116) Bilateral Immediate DIEP Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Experience at a Tertiary Care Institution
(P118) Metadherin Overexpression Is Associated With Improved Locoregional Control After Mastectomy
(P119) Effect of Economic Environment on Use of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer
(P120) Immediate Versus Delayed Reconstruction After Mastectomy in the United States Medicare Breast Cancer Patient
(P121) Trend in Age and Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer: 2004–2009
(P122) Streamlining Referring Physicians Orders With ‘Reflex Testing’ Significantly Decreases Time to Resolution for Abnormal Screening Mammograms
(P123) National Trends in the Local Management of Early-Stage Paget Disease of the Breast
(P124) Effect of Inhomogeneity on Cardiac and Lung Dose in Partial-Breast Irradiation Using HDR Brachytherapy
(P125) Breast Cancer Outcomes With Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy for Residual Disease Burden After Full-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery Followed by Radiation Treatment
Recent Videos
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Future meetings may address how immunotherapy, bispecific agents, and CAR T-cell therapies can further impact the AML treatment paradigm.
Treatment with revumenib appeared to demonstrate efficacy among patients with KMT2A-rearranged acute leukemia in the phase 2 AUGMENT-101 study.
Advocacy groups such as Cancer Support Community and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society may help support patients with CML undergoing treatment.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, discusses the potential utility of agents such as datopotamab deruxtecan and enfortumab vedotin in patients with breast cancer.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, highlights strategies related to screening and multidisciplinary collaboration for managing ILD in patients who receive T-DXd.
Data from the REVEAL study affirm elevated white blood cell counts and higher variant allele frequency as risk factors for progression in polycythemia vera.
Related Content