(P056) Ten-Year Outcomes of Patients With Gleason Score 9/10 Prostate Cancer Treated With Trimodality Therapy

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 29 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 29
Issue 4_Suppl_1

In this large, retrospective series, we report very good long-term oncologic outcomes and minimal toxicity in patients with GS 9/10 prostate cancer treated with combination EBRT, LDRBT, and ADT. Trimodality therapy is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for these very-high-risk patients.

Andrew T. Wong, MD, A. Sivathayalan, R. Salant, MD, L. Harrison, MD, R. Stewart, MD, T. Carpenter, MD, D. Shasha, MD; Mount Sinai Beth Israel; Carleton University

OBJECTIVE: Multiple publications have reported poor biochemical control in patients with localized Gleason score (GS) 9/10 prostate cancer treated with either surgery or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Few studies have specifically addressed brachytherapy outcomes in this cohort or reported outcomes beyond 5 years. The purpose of this study is to report long-term clinical outcomes in patients with GS 9/10 prostate cancer treated with combination EBRT, low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDRBT), and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 73 patients with localized GS 9/10 prostate cancer treated with combination therapy from 1998 to 2012 at a single institution; 27 patients had one high-risk feature (stage T3a/b or PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL), 33 had two features, and 13 had three features. Patients received pelvic EBRT to 50.4 Gy followed by an LDRBT boost (108 Gy 125I, 90 Gy 103Pd). All implants and contours were performed by a single physician (DS). Luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist was given for a median duration of 25 months. Biochemical failure was defined using the Phoenix criteria (PSA nadir + 2). Biochemical progression–free survival (BPFS), prostate cancer–specific survival (PCSS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Cox regression analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression was performed to identify factors that may impact BPFS: 1 high-risk feature vs > 1 feature (P = .0358), stage < T3c vs T3c (P = .240), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 50 ng/mL vs ≥ 50 ng/mL (P = .753), and isotope 125I vs 103Pd (P = .471). Toxicity was graded using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects version 3.0 (CTCAE v3.0).

RESULTS: Minimum and median follow-ups were 20 and 55 months, respectively. Five-year actuarial BPFS, PCSS, and OS were 76.4%, 95.1%, and 88.2%, respectively. Ten-year BPFS, PCSS, and OS were 63.4%, 80.5%, and 59.1%. Median time to biochemical failure was 51 months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that a higher number of high-risk features was significant (P = .057), but T3c (P = .378) and PSA ≥ 50 ng/mL (P = .600) were not significant predictors of BPFS. No patients developed acute urinary retention requiring urinary catheterization. One patient developed grade 3 toxicity, and there was no other cases of grade 3/4 genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS: In this large, retrospective series, we report very good long-term oncologic outcomes and minimal toxicity in patients with GS 9/10 prostate cancer treated with combination EBRT, LDRBT, and ADT. Trimodality therapy is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for these very-high-risk patients.

Proceedings of the 97th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society- americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(P005) Ultrasensitive PSA Identifies Patients With Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer Requiring Postop Radiotherapy
(P001) Disparities in the Local Management of Breast Cancer in the United States According to Health Insurance Status
(P002) Predictors of CNS Disease in Metastatic Melanoma: Desmoplastic Subtype Associated With Higher Risk
(P003) Identification of Somatic Mutations Using Fine Needle Aspiration: Correlation With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
(P004) A Retrospective Study to Assess Disparities in the Utilization of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Proton Therapy (PT) in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer (PCa)
(S001) Tumor Control and Toxicity Outcomes for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Re-Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)-A Fifteen-Year Experience
(S003) Weekly IGRT Volumetric Response Analysis as a Predictive Tool for Locoregional Control in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy 
(S004) Combination of Radiotherapy and Cetuximab for Aggressive, High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck: A Propensity Score Analysis
(S005) Radiotherapy for Carcinoma of the Hypopharynx Over Five Decades: Experience at a Single Institution
(S002) Prognostic Value of Intraradiation Treatment FDG-PET Parameters in Locally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
(P006) The Role of Sequential Imaging in Cervical Cancer Management
(P008) Pretreatment FDG Uptake of Nontarget Lung Tissue Correlates With Symptomatic Pneumonitis Following Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR)
(P009) Monte Carlo Dosimetry Evaluation of Lung Stereotactic Body Radiosurgery
(P010) Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Treatment of Adrenal Gland Metastasis: Toxicity, Outcomes, and Patterns of Failure
(P011) Stereotactic Radiosurgery and BRAF Inhibitor Therapy for Melanoma Brain Metastases Is Associated With Increased Risk for Radiation Necrosis
Related Videos
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
Data highlight that patients who are in Black and poor majority areas are less likely to receive liver ablation or colorectal liver metastasis in surgical cancer care.
Findings highlight how systemic issues may impact disparities in outcomes following surgery for patients with cancer, according to Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery may allow practices to de-escalate subsequent radiotherapy, says Barbara Smith, MD, PhD.
Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD, discussed ways to improve treatment and surgical outcomes for patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.
Barbara Smith, MD, PhD, spoke about the potential use of pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery based on reports from the phase 3 INSITE trial.
Patient-reported symptoms following surgery appear to improve with the use of perioperative telemonitoring, says Kelly M. Mahuron, MD.
Treatment options in the refractory setting must improve for patients with resected colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis, says Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Although immature, overall survival data from the KEYNOTE-868 trial may support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Related Content