
Opinion|Videos|January 13, 2025
Second-Line Treatment for R/R Multiple Myeloma: Who Is the “Right Patient”?
Panelists discuss how, for second-line treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM), patients suitable for CAR T-cell (cilta-cel vs ide-cel) therapy typically have a poor prognosis with limited response to prior therapies. Institutional guidelines focus on factors such as prior lines of therapy, organ function, and cytogenetics. Non-medical factors, such as geographic access and financial constraints, also influence CAR T-cell therapy referral eligibility.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- Which patients do you consider for CAR T-cell therapy in second-line treatment for R/R MM (cilta-cel vs ide-cel)?
- Can you describe the specific criteria/institutional guidelines used to determine patient eligibility for CAR T-cell therapy referral?
- How do nonmedical factors (location, money, etc) impact patient selection?
Newsletter
Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on CancerNetwork
1
Modifiable Risk Factors Suggest Potential for Improving Cancer Prevention
2
Barriers to CAR T-Cell Referral and Center Access in Multiple Myeloma
3
2026 Tandem Meetings: What’s the Latest Research in Multiple Myeloma?
4
Exploring The Impact of ADTs on Cardiac Risk in Prostate Cancer Treatment
5



































