All News

Socioeconomic or racial disparities may contribute to unchanged overall survival among certain patients with metastatic uterine cancer.

Despite all groups completing chemoradiation within 56 days, delays contributed to a nonsignificant difference in length between Black vs White patients.

A lot of James B. Yu’s research begins with something as simple as a question from a patient regarding what aspects of treatment may be most beneficial.

The combination regimen was well tolerated in JAK inhibitor-naïve myelofibrosis, with instances of thrombocytopenia managed with dose modifications.

A phase 2 trial found that pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib elicited an overall response rate of 37.5% that consisted entirely of partial responses in high-grade serous PROC.

Data show deep responses with rinatabart sesutecan among patients regardless of folate receptor alpha expression level in a phase 1/2 study.

The adverse effect profile of abemaciclib plus hormonal therapy was comparable with prior reports of CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Phase 3 data support ramucirumab/paclitaxel switch maintenance as a post-induction therapy for patients who are not eligible for immunotherapy.

The median PFS in patients with pMMR TP53 wild-type endometrial cancer was 39.5 months with selinexor and 4.9 months with placebo.

Overall survival outcomes were enhanced with Orca-T vs allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies.

In radiation oncology, renal cancers are experiencing the greatest levels of change and growth, according to James B. Yu.

Low grade serous ovarian cancer, a rare epithelial ovarian cancer subtype, requires differentiated treatment from its high-grade counterpart.

Results from the OVARIO trial found HRQOL maintained with niraparib/bevacizumab maintenance in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Puxitatug samrotecan was well tolerated in patients with advanced or metastatic endometrial cancer.

A slightly higher complete response rate was observed with the metformin regimen vs with the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD alone in endometrial cancer.

Results from the phase 2 DURBAC trial showed BVAC-C/durvalumab improved response in HPV+ cervical cancer.

The REFRαME-O1 trial improved response in patients with FRα–positive platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, including those with low to medium expression when given luveltamab tazevibulin.

No deaths or significant adverse effects were reported in the screened population among those who received hysteroscopic resection for endometrial cancer.

Mirvetuximab soravtansine additionally showcased PFS, ORR, and DOR benefits over chemotherapy in FRα-positive platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

The phase 2 trial is currently accruing additional patients with advanced mesonephric gynecologic cancer for treatment with avutometinib/defactinib.

The KEYLYNK-001 trial found improved PFS among patients with advanced ovarian cancer given pembrolizumab/olaparib.

Combining zimberelimab with lenvatinib produced a manageable safety profile among patients with advanced cervical cancer in a phase 2 trial.

Although there was no statistical significance in survival data, afuresertib/paclitaxel improved PFS vs paclitaxel in patients with the pAKT biomarker.

Cadonilimab plus lenvatinib appeared to have a manageable safety profile in a phase 2 trial.

Despite similar 36-week results, chemoradiation showed a statistically significant difference in QOL scores at 3 and 7 weeks vs radiation therapy alone.

Adding maintenance olaparib to durvalumab/chemotherapy in pMMR endometrial cancer improved PFS among those with detectable ctDNA at baseline.

Second interim analysis results from the KEYNOTE-A18 trial show continued efficacy of pembrolizumab/CCRT in those with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Endocrine therapy as a treatment for breast cancer showed similar long-lasting physical health decline data as what was seen in women who did not have breast cancer.

Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone results from the real world continued to show effective responses and a tolerable safety profile.

As artificial intelligence has arrived in the oncology field, experts discuss how this new technology can have implications for transforming clinical practice.