Nathan Denlinger, DO, MS

Panelists review a patient with relapsed LBCL presenting with symptomatic disease and logistical barriers to treatment access. The discussion highlights how proximity to treatment centers, work demands, and concerns about toxicity influence therapy selection. Faculty consider practical approaches to balancing efficacy, access, and quality-of-life considerations.

Panelists evaluate a young patient with early relapsed LBCL following frontline therapy who is curious about CAR T. Discussion focuses on high-risk disease features, long-term treatment goals, and considerations such as family planning and treatment durability. Faculty debate how these factors influence selection of second-line therapy.

Panelists discuss strategies to improve access to CAR T therapy and optimize delivery across treatment settings. Key considerations include referral timing, coordination between community and academic centers, and the potential role of outpatient CAR T programs. Faculty explore how infrastructure, logistics, and multidisciplinary collaboration affect real-world access to therapy.

Panelists debate optimal second-line treatment strategies for patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL. The discussion explores decision factors such as patient fitness and lifestyle, disease biology, timing of relapse, and transplant eligibility when selecting between CAR T-cell therapy and transplant-based approaches. Faculty weigh evolving evidence alongside practical considerations influencing treatment sequencing.

Panelists analyze real-world outcomes for patients receiving CAR T therapy in LBCL using US electronic medical record data from Flatiron Health. Discussion highlights differences and similarities in survival outcomes, safety events such as CRS and neurotoxicity, and healthcare resource utilization in outpatient settings for two key CAR T products. Faculty consider how these findings compare with clinical trial data and inform real-world treatment expectations.

Panelists discuss real-world treatment patterns for relapsed/refractory LBCL using the Flatiron Health electronic health record database. The conversation examines shifts in second- and third-line therapy use following CAR T approval, including declining reliance on salvage chemotherapy and transplant.

Panelists review the final analysis of the ZUMA-7 study evaluating axi-cel versus salvage chemotherapy followed by transplant. Discussion focuses on long-term event-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival outcomes. Faculty also assess the safety profile and implications for positioning CAR T as a preferred second-line strategy.

Panelists discuss long-term outcomes from the TRANSFORM study evaluating liso-cel in second-line relapsed/refractory LBCL. The conversation highlights durability of response, progression-free and overall survival trends, and updated safety findings presented at the American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting 2025. Faculty consider how extended follow-up informs expectations for long-term remission with CAR T therapy.

Panelists discuss how the treatment landscape for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is poised for transformation as novel chimeric antigen receptor T-cell approaches integrate with existing therapies, enhancing efficacy and durability. Insights from Tandem 2025 highlight advancements in cellular therapy, including combinatorial strategies and next-generation chimeric antigen receptor T-cell designs, driving optimism for improved patient outcomes.

Panelists discuss that when selecting a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) product for a patient with an aggressive clinical course and eligibility for cellular therapy, key considerations include urgency, toxicity risks, and efficacy. Factors such as time to manufacture, cytokine release syndrome/immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome rates, long-term remission data, and antigen specificity guide decision-making.

Panelists discuss how, when selecting among chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies, medical professionals typically consider several key factors: the specific cancer type and its CD19/BCMA expression, FDA-approved indications for each therapy, the patient’s prior treatments and response history, the therapy’s documented efficacy and safety profile, manufacturing time and availability, and center-specific experience with different products. Patient-specific factors like comorbidities and disease burden also influence the decision.

Panelists discuss how the choice between chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) requires careful evaluation of multiple patient-specific factors. Medical professionals consider disease type and stage, prior treatments, patient age and fitness, cytogenetic risk, donor availability, and timing. CAR T may be preferred for relapsed/refractory cases, whereas transplant remains standard for eligible newly diagnosed patients.

Panelists discuss how patient-specific characteristics in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma significantly impact chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy outcomes, suggesting that standardized treatment algorithms may need refinement. Factors like tumor biology, immune status, and genetic profiles could help optimize therapeutic selection and sequencing.

Panelists discuss key factors in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) sequencing for relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, including manufacturing success rates, production turnaround time, and real-world efficacy data. Treatment decisions weigh bridging therapy needs, patient fitness, and center-specific experience with different CAR T products and their reliability.

Panelists discuss the comparison between clinical trial results and real-world outcomes for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies like liso-cel and axi-cel. Clinical trials have shown promising efficacy and manageable safety profiles for both therapies in treating certain blood cancers. However, real-world evidence continues to emerge through ongoing clinical use and registry data collection.

Panelists discuss the efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) and compare the data collected from the TRANSFORM and ZUMA-7 trials, including information regarding the patient control group, patient population prior response, crossovers of both trials, and vein-to-vein time.

Panelists discuss the optimal timing of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), which requires careful evaluation of patient fitness, disease burden, prior treatment response, and logistical factors. Key considerations include performance status, comorbidities, disease aggressiveness, and the availability of bridging therapy. Treatment decisions should be individualized based on patient-specific risk factors, prior therapy outcomes, and care goals while balancing the potential benefits and risks across different lines of treatment.

Panelists discuss, when evaluating chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), how key considerations include the patient’s fitness, disease burden, prior treatment response, and timing of referral. The limitations of traditional salvage therapy, with historically poor outcomes, must be weighed against CAR T’s potential for durable remissions despite its risks and complexities.

Panelists discuss how the diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treatment landscape has seen significant evolution with the integration of targeted therapies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell treatments, supplementing traditional R-CHOP. However, early relapsed/refractory cases remain challenging due to complex tumor biology and resistance mechanisms. This underscores the need for better up-front risk stratification tools and biomarker-driven treatment selection.