TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 24-25

TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy

TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy

Background

ET plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) is the standard of care (SOC) in first-line estrogen receptor–positive/HER2-negative (ER+/HER2–) advanced breast cancer; however, tumors eventually develop resistance. Constitutive activation in PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway can contribute to endocrine resistance in breast cancer. The ESR1 mutation is a common type of acquired resistance that emerges in 40% to 50% of patients in the metastatic setting after prolonged aromatase inhibitor exposure. There is an unmet need for novel therapeutic approaches to overcome resistance mechanisms and improve outcomes in patients with ER+/HER2– advanced breast cancer with ESR1-mutated tumors progressing after ET plus CDK4/6i. Elacestrant is a next-generation oral SERD that binds to ER-alpha, inducing its degradation. In the phase 3 EMERALD study (NCT03778931), elacestrant improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs SOC ET in patients with ESR1-mutated tumors (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39-0.77; P = .0005). Differences were notable among patients who received prior ET plus CDK4/6i 12 months or more; median PFS with elacestrant was 8.6 months vs 1.9 months with SOC ET (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.26-0.63). Crosstalk between ER and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways provides a rationale for evaluating elacestrantwith everolimus (an mTORC1 inhibitor). The phase 3 ADELA study (NCT06382948) compares elacestrant plus everolimus vs. elacestrant plus placebo in patients with ER+/HER2– advanced breast cancer with ESR1-mutated tumors progressing on ET plus CDK4/6i.

Materials and Methods

ADELA is an international, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Eligible patients are adults (>18 years) with ER+/HER2– advanced breast cancer with ESR1-mutated tumors, previously treated with 1 to 2 lines of ET for advanced breast cancer, and evidence of disease progression on prior ET plus CDK4/6i for advanced after 6 months or more. Patients receiving CDK4/6i-based adjuvant therapy are eligible (disease progression must be confirmed after 12 months or more of treatment but less than 12 months following CDK4/6i completion). Other criteria include adequate organ function and ECOG performance status of 0 to 1. Exclusion criteria include prior chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer and active uncontrolled/symptomatic brain metastasis. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to 28-day cycles of elacestrant at 345 mg plus everolimus at 7.5 mg by mouth or elacestrant at 345 mg plus placebo by mouth until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, based on dose determined in phase 1/2 ELEVATE trial (NCT05563220). Patients will receive dexamethasone mouthwash during the first 8 weeks. Stratification factors are the presence of visceral metastases (yes vs no) and duration of prior CDK4/6i (≥12 months vs <12 months). The primary objective will evaluate BIRC-based PFS.Secondary end points included investigator-assessed PFS, overall survival, overall response rate, clinical benefit rate, duration of response, time to response, the best percentage change in tumor burden, safety, and health-related quality of life.

Status

Planned enrollment is 240 patients; recruitment is ongoing.

Articles in this issue

42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US
42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US
TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy
TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy
45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Multidisciplinary care can help ensure that treatment planning does not deviate from established guidelines for inflammatory breast cancer management.
Photographic and written documentation can help providers recognize inflammatory breast cancer symptoms across diverse populations.
The use of guideline-concordant care in breast cancer appears to be more common in White populations than Black populations.
Strict inclusion criteria may disproportionately exclude racial minority populations from participating in breast cancer trials.
Related Content