Leukemia

Latest News

The FDA has set a Prescription Drug User Fee Act date of October 25, 2025, for approving revumenib in this acute myeloid leukemia population.
FDA Grants Priority Review to Revumenib in R/R NPM1-Mutant AML

June 25th 2025

The FDA has set a Prescription Drug User Fee Act date of October 25, 2025, for approving revumenib in this acute myeloid leukemia population.

Bexobrutideg Achieves High Objective Response Rate in Heavily Pretreated R/R CLL
Bexobrutideg Achieves High Objective Response Rate in Heavily Pretreated R/R CLL

June 18th 2025

Olutasidenib Maintenance Shows Clinically Meaningful Activity in IDH1-Mutated AML
Olutasidenib Maintenance Shows Clinically Meaningful Activity in IDH1-Mutated AML

June 17th 2025

Ponatinib Shows Clinical Benefit Over Imatinib in MRD-Positive Ph+ ALL Post Induction
Ponatinib Shows Clinical Benefit Over Imatinib in MRD-Positive Ph+ ALL Post Induction

June 17th 2025

Data from ASCERTAIN-V may support venetoclax plus decitabine/cedazuridine as a new standard of care in those with AML ineligible to receive chemotherapy.
Oral Venetoclax Combo Elicits Responses, Survival in Newly Diagnosed AML

June 15th 2025

Latest CME Events & Activities

Medical Crossfire®: Harnessing the Power of Modern Therapies in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

View More

Cases and Conversations™: Sorting Through the Expanding Treatment Options for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

View More

Cases & Conversations™: Transforming AML Care—Precision Strategies, Evolving Therapies, and Clinical Insights

View More

Medical Crossfire®: Improving Patient Outcomes in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms With Novel Therapeutic Approaches

View More

Fighting Disparities and Saving Lives: An Exploration of Challenges and Solutions in Cancer Care

View More

Community Practice Connections™: Selecting and Sequencing Therapy for Patients with DLBCL in an Era of Expanding Options

View More

BURST Expert Illustrations and Commentaries™: Exploring the Mechanistic Rationale for CSF-1R– Directed Treatment in Chronic GVHD

View More

(CME) Optimizing Management of Ocular Toxicity in Cancer Patients: The Role of Ophthalmologists in the Spectrum of Care

View More

(COPE) Optimizing Management of Ocular Toxicity in Cancer Patients: The Role of Ophthalmologists in the Spectrum of Care

View More

Community Practice Connections™: 6th Annual Precision Medicine Symposium – An Illustrated Tumor Board

View More

Medical Crossfire®: Expert Interpretations of the Latest Data in CLL Management – Understanding the Impact of Optimal Treatment Selection on Patient Outcomes

View More

Community Practice Connections™: Tailored Treatment Approaches for Older Patients With Advanced HR+/HER2– Breast Cancer

View More

More News


Site Logo

New Therapeutic Options for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

December 1st 2007

For decades, initial therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) consisted of alkylators such as chlorambucil (Leukeran). The introduction of nucleoside analogs such as fludarabine and monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab (Rituxan) markedly changed the initial therapy of CLL, particularly in the United States. Fludarabine and combination regimens such as fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (FC) have achieved higher complete response (CR) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) than chlorambucil in previously untreated CLL, but long-term overall survival has not improved, due to concurrent improvement in salvage therapy of relapsed CLL patients. Upfront chemoimmunotherapy regimens such as fludarabine/rituximab (FR) and fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) have similarly improved CR rates and PFS in previously untreated CLL patients, but it is unclear whether overall survival is improved. Advances in cytogenetic analysis and other biologic prognostic factors have greatly enhanced clinicians' ability to risk-stratify newly diagnosed CLL patients, and knowledge of such prognostic factors is necessary to properly interpret results of clinical treatment studies. The choice of initial therapy for an individual patient should depend upon the patient's age and medical condition, cytogenetic and other prognostic factors, and whether the goal of therapy is maximization of CR and PFS or palliation of symptoms with minimal toxicity.


Site Logo

What Is the Optimal Initial Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia?

December 1st 2007

For decades, initial therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) consisted of alkylators such as chlorambucil (Leukeran). The introduction of nucleoside analogs such as fludarabine and monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab (Rituxan) markedly changed the initial therapy of CLL, particularly in the United States. Fludarabine and combination regimens such as fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (FC) have achieved higher complete response (CR) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) than chlorambucil in previously untreated CLL, but long-term overall survival has not improved, due to concurrent improvement in salvage therapy of relapsed CLL patients. Upfront chemoimmunotherapy regimens such as fludarabine/rituximab (FR) and fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) have similarly improved CR rates and PFS in previously untreated CLL patients, but it is unclear whether overall survival is improved. Advances in cytogenetic analysis and other biologic prognostic factors have greatly enhanced clinicians' ability to risk-stratify newly diagnosed CLL patients, and knowledge of such prognostic factors is necessary to properly interpret results of clinical treatment studies. The choice of initial therapy for an individual patient should depend upon the patient's age and medical condition, cytogenetic and other prognostic factors, and whether the goal of therapy is maximization of CR and PFS or palliation of symptoms with minimal toxicity.