Leukemia

Latest News

The AML Epigenomic Risk model used 946 AML-only peripheral blood or bone marrow samples at diagnosis.
AI Prognostic Tool Confirms Concordance Through Epigenomic Signatures in AML

August 26th 2025

Both experimental models significantly improved upon historical clinical risk trial groups for patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

No minimal residual disease-negativity was observed with tuspetinib in patients with AML, including in a patient with more than 7 months of follow-up data.
Tuspetinib Exhibits Enhanced Efficacy in Diverse Newly Diagnosed AML Group

August 19th 2025

Leading experts gathered in Orlando, FL, to discuss the current and future state of cellular therapy in oncology at the 2025 ICE-T Symposium.
National ICE-T Conference Aims to Make CAR T Safer and More Available

August 2nd 2025

Durable Response to CAR T is Associated With Elevated Activation and Clonotypic Expansion of the Cytotoxic Native T Cell Repertoire
Durable Response to CAR T is Associated With Elevated Activation and Clonotypic Expansion of the Cytotoxic Native T Cell Repertoire

July 30th 2025

Data from the phase 3 BRUIN CLL-314 trial show a progression-free survival trend favoring pirtobrutinib compared with ibrutinib in patients with CLL/SLL.
Pirtobrutinib Yields Noninferior ORR Vs Ibrutinib in CLL/SLL

July 30th 2025

Latest CME Events & Activities

More News


Site Logo

New Therapeutic Options for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

December 1st 2007

For decades, initial therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) consisted of alkylators such as chlorambucil (Leukeran). The introduction of nucleoside analogs such as fludarabine and monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab (Rituxan) markedly changed the initial therapy of CLL, particularly in the United States. Fludarabine and combination regimens such as fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (FC) have achieved higher complete response (CR) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) than chlorambucil in previously untreated CLL, but long-term overall survival has not improved, due to concurrent improvement in salvage therapy of relapsed CLL patients. Upfront chemoimmunotherapy regimens such as fludarabine/rituximab (FR) and fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) have similarly improved CR rates and PFS in previously untreated CLL patients, but it is unclear whether overall survival is improved. Advances in cytogenetic analysis and other biologic prognostic factors have greatly enhanced clinicians' ability to risk-stratify newly diagnosed CLL patients, and knowledge of such prognostic factors is necessary to properly interpret results of clinical treatment studies. The choice of initial therapy for an individual patient should depend upon the patient's age and medical condition, cytogenetic and other prognostic factors, and whether the goal of therapy is maximization of CR and PFS or palliation of symptoms with minimal toxicity.


Site Logo

What Is the Optimal Initial Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia?

December 1st 2007

For decades, initial therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) consisted of alkylators such as chlorambucil (Leukeran). The introduction of nucleoside analogs such as fludarabine and monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab (Rituxan) markedly changed the initial therapy of CLL, particularly in the United States. Fludarabine and combination regimens such as fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (FC) have achieved higher complete response (CR) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) than chlorambucil in previously untreated CLL, but long-term overall survival has not improved, due to concurrent improvement in salvage therapy of relapsed CLL patients. Upfront chemoimmunotherapy regimens such as fludarabine/rituximab (FR) and fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) have similarly improved CR rates and PFS in previously untreated CLL patients, but it is unclear whether overall survival is improved. Advances in cytogenetic analysis and other biologic prognostic factors have greatly enhanced clinicians' ability to risk-stratify newly diagnosed CLL patients, and knowledge of such prognostic factors is necessary to properly interpret results of clinical treatment studies. The choice of initial therapy for an individual patient should depend upon the patient's age and medical condition, cytogenetic and other prognostic factors, and whether the goal of therapy is maximization of CR and PFS or palliation of symptoms with minimal toxicity.