Challenges in Treating Non–Clear Cell RCC
September 12th 2025Panelists discuss how non–clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents a challenging, heterogeneous collection of rare tumors comprising 25% to 30% of all RCC cases, requiring careful histological review and individualized risk stratification based on tumor biology, disease tempo, and burden rather than traditional treatment algorithms used for clear cell RCC.
Introducing KEYNOTE-B61 in Non–Clear Cell RCC
September 12th 2025Panelists discuss how they will review the KEYNOTE-B61 phase 2 study examining pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib for previously untreated advanced non–clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), including an overview of non–clear cell RCC and integration of the 3-year follow-up data into clinical practice.
Overview of the Second-Line nccRCC Treatment Landscape
September 12th 2025Panelists discuss the challenges of treating non–clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) after first-line progression, emphasizing the limited second-line options, the emerging use of immunotherapy (IO) and combination regimens, the need for subtype-specific strategies, and the critical role of clinical trial enrollment to advance care in this heterogeneous disease.
Overview of the First-Line nccRCC Treatment Landscape
September 12th 2025Panelists discuss recent advances in non–clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) treatment, highlighting the emerging role of immunotherapy plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations—particularly lenvatinib and pembrolizumab—in improving response rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival across diverse subtypes, while emphasizing individualized care and proactive management.
Interpreting the GALAXY and BESPOKE CRC Data: Transient ctDNA Clearance and the Risk of Recurrence
September 10th 2025Experts discuss how ctDNA dynamics after colorectal cancer surgery can guide personalized surveillance and treatment, with recurrent positivity signaling high relapse risk and potential therapy resistance, whereas sustained negativity may support less intensive monitoring, balancing effective oversight with patient quality of life.
Clinical Trial Review: CheckMate 9ER
September 8th 2025Panelists discuss how CheckMate 9ER results demonstrated significant progression-free survival and overall survival benefits with nivolumab plus cabozantinib vs sunitinib, with particularly impressive HRs for patients with visceral disease, including liver, bone, and lung metastases.
Clinical Trial Review: KEYNOTE-426
September 8th 2025Panelists discuss how the KEYNOTE-426 trial established pembrolizumab plus axitinib as an effective and well-tolerated immunotherapy-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO-TKI) combination with high response rates and unprecedented tumor control, particularly suitable for frail patients due to axitinib's selective targeting and short half-life.
What’s Next for Bispecifics: Earlier Use and More
September 8th 2025An expert explains that bispecific antibodies, currently approved for heavily pretreated multiple myeloma patients, are poised for earlier use—including maintenance and frontline settings—with ongoing research focused on safely stopping therapy after sustained minimal residual disease negativity to personalize treatment and improve long-term outcomes.
Clinical Experience in Treating ccRCC (Patient Case 1)
September 5th 2025Panelists discuss the challenges of managing intermediate-risk metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) after progression on first-line immunotherapy (IO)/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy, emphasizing cabozantinib’s role, individualized dosing strategies, proactive toxicity management, and the importance of patient-centered care to optimize long-term disease control and quality of life.
Overview of the Second-Line ccRCC Treatment Landscape
September 5th 2025Panelists discuss evolving second-line treatment strategies for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), emphasizing the impact of first-line regimens, the growing role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and emerging combinations, and the need for clinical judgment in sequencing therapies to balance disease control, symptom management, and patient quality of life.
The Importance of Multidisciplinary Communication and Care Coordination for the Resected CRC Patient
September 3rd 2025Experts discuss the critical role of clear pathology communication and risk assessment after colorectal cancer surgery, highlighting how surgical quality, pathologic staging, and timely ctDNA testing guide personalized adjuvant therapy decisions and coordinated long-term surveillance to optimize patient outcomes.
Future Directions and Collaborations in Multiple Myeloma
September 3rd 2025Panelists discuss how future directions in multiple myeloma include exciting developments like bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and GPRC5D, dual-target chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T therapies, and revolutionary in vivo CAR T approaches, while emphasizing the importance of nurse education and advocacy, compassionate patient-centered care, and a collaborative community approach where academic centers support community oncologists through accessible communication and shared care, ultimately working toward the goal of curing more patients, as evidenced by one-third of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) recipients remaining in remission 5 years later without additional therapy.
Comprehensive Care and Follow-Up for Patients Post–CAR T Infusion
September 3rd 2025Panelists discuss how comprehensive post–chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T follow-up care includes proactive immune system support through IVIG (intravenous immunoglobulin) therapy that rapidly improves immune function within days, resulting in patients achieving complete remission with undetectable light chains, eliminated M spike, negative bone marrow for plasma cells, and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status, representing the deepest possible remission, while patients report significantly improved quality of life with better stamina, ability to work in their yards, and freedom from daily chemotherapy compared with traditional treatments, with many describing CAR T as “a walk in the park” compared with stem cell transplant and emphasizing their desire to be healed rather than continuously harmed by ongoing chemotherapy regimens.